Home About Services ▾
Federal Criminal Drug Trafficking White Collar Extradition Money Laundering Violent Crimes FCPA / OFAC SEC Investigations RICO Appellate State Criminal International
News Contact

International / Extradition

Extradition Law Updates: Treaty Changes and Constitutional Challenges Affecting Latin American Clients

Extradition Law Updates

What's Changing in U.S. Extradition Law

U.S. extradition law is a complex intersection of international treaty obligations, constitutional rights, and domestic statute. For individuals in Latin America, Europe, or elsewhere who face U.S. extradition requests, understanding the current legal landscape — and their rights — is essential.

How U.S. Extradition Works

The U.S. extradition process begins with a request through diplomatic channels, typically accompanied by a formal complaint, an arrest warrant, and supporting evidence. The host country's courts evaluate whether the offense is extraditable under the applicable treaty, whether dual criminality exists, and whether any treaty exceptions apply. A skilled defense attorney can challenge every element of this process both in the host country and — after surrender — in U.S. courts.

Key Treaty Provisions — Latin American Countries

The U.S. has extradition treaties with Colombia, Venezuela, Mexico, Panama, Ecuador, Argentina, Brazil, and many other Latin American nations. However, treaty language varies significantly — and not all offenses are extraditable under all treaties. Common extraditable offenses include drug trafficking, money laundering, fraud, and violent crimes, but the specifics depend on the treaty text and the charging documents.

Constitutional Defenses After Extradition

Even after a defendant is extradited to the U.S., constitutional challenges remain available. These include: the rule of specialty (the U.S. may only prosecute for the offenses for which extradition was granted), double jeopardy challenges, challenges to the sufficiency of the indictment, and Fourth and Fifth Amendment challenges to evidence gathered abroad.

Provisional Arrest and Detention

In many extradition cases, the U.S. government requests provisional arrest before the formal extradition request is submitted. A person arrested on a provisional warrant has the right to challenge detention, and there are strict time limits on provisional arrest. Failure by the U.S. to submit a formal request within the treaty's timeframe can result in release. Early legal intervention is critical.

The Role of Miami Counsel

Having experienced U.S. counsel engaged early — before extradition occurs — can dramatically improve outcomes. We can coordinate with counsel in the host country, challenge the U.S. indictment on legal grounds, evaluate cooperation opportunities, and negotiate with the Department of Justice to achieve better outcomes before the defendant ever sets foot in a U.S. courtroom.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws change; consult an attorney for advice specific to your situation.